System Design Concepts
Table of Contents
- DNS (Domain Name System)
- API Gateway
- Load Balancer
- Proxy (Reverse & Forward)
- Vertical Scaling
- Horizontal Scaling
- Vertical DB Scaling
- Horizontal DB Scaling
- Master-Slave (Primary-Replica) DB
- Consistent Hashing
- Caching
- CDN (Content Delivery Network)
- Database Index
- CAP Theorem
- Long Polling vs WebSockets
- Decision Matrix: When to Use What
DNS (Domain Name System)
What is DNS?
DNS translates human-readable domain names (like google.com) into IP addresses that computers use to identify each other.
Why DNS?
- Human-friendly: Easy to remember domain names vs IP addresses
- Flexibility: Change server IPs without affecting users
- Load distribution: Route traffic to different servers
How DNS Works?
- User types
example.com - Browser checks local cache
- Queries DNS resolver (ISP)
- Resolver queries root nameserver
- Directed to TLD nameserver (.com)
- Finally queries authoritative nameserver
- Returns IP address
Where to Use?
- Essential for all web applications
- Microservices: Service discovery
- Global applications: Geo-based routing
When to Optimize?
- High traffic applications
- Global user base
- Multiple data centers
API Gateway
What is API Gateway?
A single entry point that manages all client requests and routes them to appropriate microservices.
Why API Gateway?
- Single entry point: Centralized access control
- Cross-cutting concerns: Authentication, logging, rate limiting
- Protocol translation: REST to GraphQL, HTTP to gRPC
- Request/Response transformation
How API Gateway Works?
Client → API Gateway → Authentication → Rate Limiting → Load Balancer → Microservice
Key Features:
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate limiting & Throttling
- Request/Response caching
- Load balancing
- Monitoring & Analytics
Where to Use?
- Microservices architecture
- Mobile applications: Single endpoint for multiple services
- Third-party API management
When to Implement?
- Multiple microservices (3+)
- Need centralized security
- Complex routing requirements
Load Balancer
What is Load Balancer?
Distributes incoming requests across multiple servers to ensure no single server gets overwhelmed.
Why Load Balancer?
- High availability: No single point of failure
- Performance: Distribute load evenly
- Scalability: Add/remove servers easily
- Health monitoring: Route away from failed servers
Types of Load Balancing:
Layer 4 (Transport Layer)
- Routes based on IP and port
- Faster: No content inspection
- Examples: TCP/UDP load balancing
Layer 7 (Application Layer)
- Routes based on HTTP content
- Smarter: Content-based routing
- Examples: Route
/api/usersto user service
Load Balancing Algorithms:
- Round Robin: Requests distributed sequentially
- Weighted Round Robin: Servers get requests based on capacity
- Least Connections: Route to server with fewest active connections
- IP Hash: Route based on client IP hash
Where to Use?
- Web applications: Multiple app servers
- Databases: Read replicas
- Microservices: Service-to-service communication
When to Implement?
- Traffic > single server capacity
- Need high availability (99.9%+)
- Predictable traffic spikes
Proxy (Reverse & Forward)
Forward Proxy
Client → Forward Proxy → Internet → Server
Why Forward Proxy?
- Privacy: Hide client identity
- Security: Filter malicious content
- Caching: Reduce bandwidth usage
- Access control: Block certain websites
Where to Use?
- Corporate networks: Internet access control
- Privacy: VPN services
- Performance: Caching frequently accessed content
Reverse Proxy
Client → Internet → Reverse Proxy → Server
Why Reverse Proxy?
- Load balancing: Distribute requests
- SSL termination: Handle encryption/decryption
- Caching: Store responses
- Security: Hide server details
Where to Use?
- Web servers: Nginx, Apache as reverse proxy
- API servers: Hide internal architecture
- CDN: Edge servers act as reverse proxies
When to Use Each?
- Forward Proxy: Client-side control needed
- Reverse Proxy: Server-side optimization needed
Vertical Scaling
What is Vertical Scaling?
Scale Up: Adding more power (CPU, RAM, Storage) to existing machine.
Why Vertical Scaling?
- Simple: No architectural changes needed
- ACID compliance: Single database maintains consistency
- No complexity: Existing code works as-is
Limitations:
- Hardware limits: Physical constraints
- Cost: Exponentially expensive
- Single point of failure
- Downtime: Requires server restart
Where to Use?
- Traditional databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL
- Legacy applications: Cannot be distributed
- Small to medium applications
When to Choose?
- Early stage: Simple solution
- ACID requirements: Strong consistency needed
- Budget constraints: Initially cheaper
Horizontal Scaling
What is Horizontal Scaling?
Scale Out: Adding more machines to handle increased load.
Why Horizontal Scaling?
- No limits: Can add infinite machines
- Cost-effective: Use commodity hardware
- High availability: No single point of failure
- Fault tolerance: System continues if servers fail
Challenges:
- Complexity: Distributed system challenges
- Data consistency: CAP theorem limitations
- Network latency: Inter-service communication
- State management: Sessions, caching
Where to Use?
- Web applications: Stateless app servers
- NoSQL databases: MongoDB, Cassandra
- Microservices: Independent scaling
When to Choose?
- High traffic: Millions of users
- Growth expectations: Rapid scaling needed
- Global presence: Multiple regions
Vertical DB Scaling
What is Vertical DB Scaling?
Upgrade database machine → Add more CPU, RAM, faster storage to single database server.
Why Vertical DB Scaling?
- Simple: No code changes required
- ACID compliance: Maintains database consistency
- Immediate: Quick performance improvement
Limitations:
- Hardware ceiling: Physical limits
- Expensive: High-end hardware costs
- Single point of failure
- Downtime: Requires maintenance window
Where to Use?
- OLTP systems: Heavy transaction processing
- Legacy applications: Cannot modify architecture
- Compliance requirements: Single database needed
When to Choose?
- Quick fix needed
- Strong consistency required
- Limited development resources
Horizontal DB Scaling
What is Horizontal DB Scaling?
Distribute database across multiple machines using replication and sharding.
Two Main Approaches:
Replication (Read Scaling)
- Master-Slave: One write node, multiple read nodes
- Master-Master: Multiple write nodes (complex)
Sharding (Write Scaling)
- Partition data: Split across multiple databases
- Shard key: Determines data distribution
Why Horizontal DB Scaling?
- No hardware limits: Add more machines
- Cost-effective: Commodity hardware
- High availability: No single point of failure
Challenges:
- Complexity: Distributed queries
- Data consistency: Eventual consistency
- Cross-shard operations: JOINs across shards
Where to Use?
- Large datasets: TBs of data
- High write loads: Social media, IoT
- Global applications: Regional data distribution
When to Choose?
- Vertical scaling exhausted
- High read/write demands
- Cost optimization needed
Master-Slave (Primary-Replica) DB
What is Master-Slave?
Master: Handles all writes (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) Slave: Handles reads (SELECT) - replicates data from master
Why Master-Slave?
- Read scalability: Multiple slaves for read queries
- High availability: Slave can become master if primary fails
- Backup: Slaves serve as live backups
- Geographic distribution: Slaves in different regions
How Replication Works?
- Write comes to Master
- Master logs the change
- Asynchronous/Synchronous replication to slaves
- Reads distributed among slaves
Replication Types:
Synchronous Replication
- Pros: Strong consistency, no data loss
- Cons: Higher latency, availability impact
Asynchronous Replication
- Pros: Low latency, high availability
- Cons: Potential data loss, eventual consistency
Where to Use?
- Read-heavy applications: Social media feeds
- Reporting systems: Analytics on read replicas
- Geographic distribution: Regional read replicas
When to Implement?
- Read traffic >> Write traffic
- Need high availability
- Global user base
Consistent Hashing
What is Consistent Hashing?
A distributed hashing technique that minimizes data movement when nodes are added/removed.
Why Consistent Hashing?
Traditional Hashing Problem:
server = hash(key) % number_of_servers
When servers change, most keys need redistribution.
Consistent Hashing Solution:
- Hash ring: Servers and keys mapped to ring
- Minimal redistribution: Only affected keys move
How Consistent Hashing Works?
- Hash ring: 0 to 2^32-1
- Map servers: Hash server IDs to ring positions
- Map keys: Hash keys to ring positions
- Key assignment: Clockwise to next server
- Virtual nodes: Multiple positions per server for better distribution
Benefits:
- Minimal redistribution: Only 1/N keys move when adding server
- Load balancing: Virtual nodes ensure even distribution
- Fault tolerance: System continues with node failures
Where to Use?
- Distributed caches: Redis Cluster, Memcached
- Distributed databases: Cassandra, DynamoDB
- Load balancers: Consistent server assignment
- CDN: Content distribution
When to Implement?
- Dynamic scaling: Frequent server changes
- Large distributed systems
- Need predictable redistribution
Caching
What is Caching?
Temporary storage of frequently accessed data in faster storage medium.
Why Caching?
- Performance: Sub-millisecond response times
- Cost reduction: Fewer database queries
- Scalability: Handle more concurrent users
- User experience: Faster page loads
Cache Levels:
Browser Cache
- Client-side: Images, CSS, JS files
- Control: Cache-Control headers
CDN Cache
- Edge locations: Geographically distributed
- Content: Static assets, API responses
Application Cache
- In-memory: Redis, Memcached
- Content: Database query results, computed values
Database Cache
- Query cache: Cached query results
- Buffer pool: Frequently accessed pages
Caching Strategies:
Cache-Aside (Lazy Loading)
1. Check cache
2. If miss → Query DB → Update cache
3. If hit → Return from cache
Write-Through
1. Write to cache
2. Write to database
3. Return success
Write-Behind (Write-Back)
1. Write to cache
2. Return success
3. Asynchronously write to database
Refresh-Ahead
1. Refresh cache before expiration
2. Always serve from cache
Cache Eviction Policies:
- LRU: Least Recently Used
- LFU: Least Frequently Used
- TTL: Time To Live
- FIFO: First In, First Out
Where to Use?
- Web applications: Session data, user profiles
- APIs: Response caching
- Databases: Query result caching
- Static content: Images, videos, documents
When to Implement?
- Repetitive queries: Same data accessed frequently
- Expensive computations: Complex calculations
- External API calls: Third-party service responses
CDN (Content Delivery Network)
What is CDN?
Geographically distributed servers that cache and serve content from locations closest to users.
Why CDN?
- Reduced latency: Serve from nearest location
- Bandwidth optimization: Reduce origin server load
- High availability: Multiple edge locations
- DDoS protection: Absorb malicious traffic
How CDN Works?
- User requests content
- DNS resolution points to nearest edge server
- Edge server checks local cache
- Cache hit: Serve from edge
- Cache miss: Fetch from origin, cache, then serve
CDN Types:
Push CDN
- Manual upload: Content pushed to CDN
- Control: Full control over caching
- Use case: Less frequent updates
Pull CDN
- Automatic caching: CDN pulls on first request
- Convenience: No manual intervention
- Use case: Frequent content updates
Content Types:
- Static assets: Images, CSS, JS, fonts
- Dynamic content: API responses (with proper headers)
- Video streaming: Adaptive bitrate streaming
- Software downloads: Large files
Where to Use?
- Global applications: Users worldwide
- Media-heavy sites: Images, videos
- E-commerce: Product images, catalogs
- APIs: Cacheable responses
When to Implement?
- Global user base
- Large static assets
- High traffic volumes
- Need 99.9%+ availability
Database Index
What is Database Index?
Data structure that improves query performance by creating shortcuts to find data quickly.
Why Database Index?
- Query performance: O(log n) vs O(n) lookup
- Faster JOINs: Efficient table joining
- Ordering: Quick ORDER BY operations
- Uniqueness: Enforce unique constraints
How Index Works?
Without Index: Sequential scan through all rows With Index: Tree structure points directly to data
Index Types:
Primary Index
- Clustered: Data physically ordered by index key
- One per table: Usually on primary key
Secondary Index
- Non-clustered: Separate structure pointing to data
- Multiple allowed: On any column
Composite Index
- Multiple columns: Index on (col1, col2, col3)
- Column order matters: Use leftmost columns first
Unique Index
- Uniqueness enforcement: No duplicate values
- Performance: Same as regular index
Index Structures:
B-Tree Index
- Balanced tree: Equal path length to all leaves
- Range queries: Efficient for
>,<, BETWEEN - Most common: Default in most databases
Hash Index
- Hash function: Direct key-to-location mapping
- Equality queries: Only = operations
- Fast lookups: O(1) access time
Bitmap Index
- Bit arrays: Each bit represents row presence
- Low cardinality: Gender, status fields
- Data warehousing: OLAP systems
Where to Use?
- Frequently queried columns: WHERE clause columns
- JOIN columns: Foreign key relationships
- ORDER BY columns: Sorting operations
- GROUP BY columns: Aggregation queries
Index Trade-offs:
Benefits:
- Faster SELECT queries
- Faster JOINs and sorting
- Unique constraint enforcement
Costs:
- Storage overhead (10-15% of table size)
- Slower INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
- Index maintenance overhead
When to Create Index?
- Query frequency: Column used in many queries
- Query performance: Slow queries on large tables
- Cardinality: High selectivity (many unique values)
When NOT to Create Index?
- Frequently updated columns: High write overhead
- Small tables: Sequential scan is faster
- Low selectivity: Few unique values
CAP Theorem
What is CAP Theorem?
Impossible to guarantee all three properties simultaneously in a distributed system:
- Consistency
- Availability
- Partition tolerance
The Three Properties:
Consistency (C)
All nodes see the same data simultaneously
- Strong consistency: All reads return most recent write
- Eventual consistency: System will become consistent over time
- Weak consistency: No guarantees about when consistency occurs
Availability (A)
System remains operational 100% of the time
- High availability: System responds to requests
- Fault tolerance: Continues operating despite failures
- No single point of failure
Partition Tolerance (P)
System continues operating despite network failures
- Network splits: Nodes cannot communicate
- Message loss: Packets dropped or delayed
- Distributed reality: Network failures are inevitable
CAP Combinations:
CP Systems (Consistency + Partition Tolerance)
Sacrifice Availability: System may become unavailable during partitions
- Examples: MongoDB, Redis Cluster, HBase
- Use case: Banking systems, inventory management
- Behavior: Block operations until consistency restored
AP Systems (Availability + Partition Tolerance)
Sacrifice Consistency: Accept temporary inconsistency for availability
- Examples: Cassandra, DynamoDB, CouchDB
- Use case: Social media, content delivery
- Behavior: Continue serving potentially stale data
CA Systems (Consistency + Availability)
Not partition tolerant: Only work in single node or perfect network
- Examples: Traditional RDBMS in single node
- Reality: Not feasible in distributed systems
- Note: Network partitions will occur
Real-World Examples:
Banking System (CP)
Scenario: Transfer $100 from Account A to Account B
Choice: Ensure both accounts updated correctly OR system available
Decision: Block operation until consistency guaranteed
Social Media Feed (AP)
Scenario: User posts update, friends should see it
Choice: All friends see update immediately OR system stays responsive
Decision: Some friends may see stale feed temporarily
PACELC Theorem
Extension of CAP: Even without partitions, trade-off between Latency and Consistency
PAC: During partition, choose A or C ELC: Else (normal operation), choose L (Latency) or C (Consistency)
Where to Apply?
- System design decisions: Choose database based on requirements
- Architecture planning: Understand trade-offs upfront
- Incident response: Know which property to sacrifice
When to Choose What?
Choose CP when:
- Financial systems: Money transfers, trading
- Inventory management: Stock levels
- Configuration systems: Feature flags
- Strong consistency required
Choose AP when:
- Social networks: Posts, comments, likes
- Content delivery: News, articles
- User-generated content: Reviews, ratings
- User experience priority
Long Polling vs WebSockets
The Real-Time Communication Problem
Challenge: HTTP is request-response, but we need server-to-client communication.
Long Polling
What is Long Polling?
Client sends request → Server holds request open → Sends response when data available
How Long Polling Works?
1. Client sends HTTP request
2. Server holds connection open (30-60 seconds)
3. When data available: Send response + close connection
4. Client immediately sends new request
5. Repeat cycle
Why Long Polling?
- HTTP compatible: Works with existing infrastructure
- Simple: Easy to implement and debug
- Fallback friendly: Graceful degradation
- Firewall friendly: Uses standard HTTP
Long Polling Limitations:
- Resource intensive: One connection per client
- Latency: Still request-response cycle
- Proxy issues: Some proxies timeout connections
- Scalability: Thread-per-connection model
WebSockets
What are WebSockets?
Full-duplex communication over single TCP connection - both client and server can send data anytime.
How WebSockets Work?
1. HTTP handshake: Upgrade to WebSocket protocol
2. Persistent connection: TCP connection stays open
3. Bidirectional: Both sides can send messages
4. Low overhead: Minimal frame overhead
5. Close connection: Either side can close
Why WebSockets?
- Real-time: Instant bidirectional communication
- Low latency: No HTTP overhead per message
- Efficient: Single connection, minimal overhead
- Stateful: Connection maintains context
WebSocket Limitations:
- Complexity: More complex than HTTP
- Infrastructure: Proxy/firewall configuration needed
- Connection management: Handle disconnections, reconnections
- Scaling: Sticky sessions or sophisticated load balancing
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Long Polling | WebSockets |
|---|---|---|
| Latency | Medium (HTTP overhead) | Low (minimal overhead) |
| Scalability | Limited (connection per client) | Better (efficient connections) |
| Infrastructure | HTTP compatible | Requires WebSocket support |
| Bidirectional | No (request-response only) | Yes (both directions) |
| Implementation | Simple | More complex |
| Debugging | Easy (standard HTTP tools) | Harder (specialized tools) |
| Resource Usage | High (server resources) | Low (efficient protocol) |
When to Use Long Polling?
Use Cases:
- Simple notifications: Order status updates
- Infrequent updates: News alerts, system notifications
- Legacy systems: Cannot modify infrastructure
- Simple requirements: Basic real-time features
Ideal Scenarios:
- Low message frequency: Few messages per minute
- Simple infrastructure: Standard HTTP stack
- Development speed: Quick implementation needed
- Fallback mechanism: For WebSocket failures
When to Use WebSockets?
Use Cases:
- Real-time collaboration: Google Docs, Figma
- Gaming: Multiplayer games, real-time updates
- Trading platforms: Live price updates
- Chat applications: Instant messaging
- Live streaming: Real-time comments, reactions
Ideal Scenarios:
- High frequency: Many messages per second
- Bidirectional: Both client and server send data
- Low latency: Millisecond response times needed
- Rich interactions: Complex real-time features
Implementation Examples:
Long Polling Pattern:
// Client-side
async function longPoll() {
while (true) {
try {
const response = await fetch('/poll', {
timeout: 30000, // 30 second timeout
});
const data = await response.json();
handleUpdate(data);
} catch (error) {
await sleep(5000); // Wait before retrying
}
}
}
WebSocket Pattern:
// Client-side
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:8080');
ws.onmessage = event => {
const data = JSON.parse(event.data);
handleUpdate(data);
};
ws.send(JSON.stringify({ type: 'subscribe', channel: 'updates' }));
Hybrid Approaches:
- Start with Long Polling: Upgrade to WebSockets when needed
- Graceful degradation: WebSockets with Long Polling fallback
- Server-Sent Events (SSE): Server-to-client only, simpler than WebSockets
Decision Matrix: When to Use What
Application Scale Classifications
Small Scale (< 10K users)
- Simple architecture: Monolith preferred
- Single database: Vertical scaling sufficient
- Basic infrastructure: Standard hosting
- Quick development: Time to market priority
Medium Scale (10K - 100K users)
- Modular monolith: Some service separation
- Database optimization: Indexes, caching
- Load balancing: Multiple app servers
- Performance monitoring: Identify bottlenecks
Large Scale (100K - 1M users)
- Microservices: Domain-driven separation
- Database scaling: Read replicas, caching layers
- Distributed systems: Multiple data centers
- Advanced monitoring: APM, distributed tracing
Massive Scale (1M+ users)
- Global distribution: Multiple regions
- Sharding: Horizontal database partitioning
- Advanced caching: Multi-layer cache hierarchy
- Specialized systems: Search engines, message queues
Decision Framework by Application Type
E-commerce Platform
Small Scale:
- Architecture: Monolithic application
- Database: Single PostgreSQL with indexes
- Caching: Application-level caching (Redis)
- CDN: Basic CDN for images
- Real-time: Long polling for order updates
Medium Scale:
- Architecture: Modular services (User, Order, Payment, Inventory)
- Database: Master-slave PostgreSQL + Redis
- Load Balancer: nginx with multiple app servers
- Caching: Multi-layer (Redis + Application cache)
- CDN: Global CDN with API caching
Large Scale:
- Architecture: Full microservices with API Gateway
- Database: Sharded databases + Read replicas
- Scaling: Horizontal scaling with container orchestration
- Caching: Distributed caching with consistent hashing
- Real-time: WebSockets for live inventory updates
Social Media Platform
Small Scale:
- Architecture: Monolithic with separate media service
- Database: Single database with heavy indexing
- Caching: User session and feed caching
- Storage: Cloud storage for media
- Real-time: Long polling for notifications
Medium Scale:
- Architecture: Service separation (User, Post, Media, Notification)
- Database: Master-slave with dedicated read replicas for feeds
- Caching: Feed caching + Content caching
- CDN: Global CDN for media delivery
- Search: Elasticsearch for content search
Large Scale:
- Architecture: Event-driven microservices
- Database: Multiple specialized databases (Graph for social, Time-series for analytics)
- Scaling: Auto-scaling with message queues
- Caching: Multi-layer with edge caching
- Real-time: WebSockets for live features
- Consistency: AP system (eventual consistency)
Financial Trading Platform
Any Scale:
- Consistency: CP system (strong consistency required)
- Database: ACID-compliant database with immediate consistency
- Caching: Limited caching (data freshness critical)
- Real-time: WebSockets with ultra-low latency
- Architecture: Highly optimized, minimal network hops
- Monitoring: Real-time monitoring with strict SLAs
Gaming Platform
Small Scale:
- Architecture: Game servers + matchmaking service
- Database: In-memory state + persistent storage for player data
- Real-time: WebSockets for game state
- Caching: Player profile caching
Large Scale:
- Architecture: Distributed game servers with load balancing
- Database: Sharded player data + leaderboard systems
- Scaling: Auto-scaling based on player count
- CDN: Global CDN for game assets
- Real-time: Optimized WebSocket connections with connection pooling
Technology Selection Guide
When to Choose Each Database Pattern:
Single Database:
- User count: < 10K
- Data size: < 100GB
- Query complexity: Complex joins needed
- Consistency: Strong ACID requirements
Master-Slave Replication:
- Read/Write ratio: 80/20 or higher
- User count: 10K - 100K
- Geographic distribution: Multiple regions
- Availability: High availability needed
Horizontal Sharding:
- User count: 100K+
- Data size: 1TB+
- Write-heavy: High write throughput
- Growth: Rapid scaling needed
When to Choose Each Caching Strategy:
Application Cache Only:
- Small scale: < 10K users
- Simple data: User sessions, configurations
- Budget: Minimal infrastructure cost
Redis/Memcached:
- Medium scale: 10K - 100K users
- Structured caching: Complex data structures
- Persistence: Optional data persistence
Multi-layer Caching:
- Large scale: 100K+ users
- Global: Multiple data centers
- Performance: Sub-millisecond requirements
When to Choose Each Real-time Solution:
No Real-time:
- Batch processing: Reporting, analytics
- Simple apps: Basic CRUD operations
- Cost-sensitive: Minimal infrastructure
Long Polling:
- Low frequency: < 1 message/minute per user
- Simple infrastructure: Standard HTTP stack
- Legacy systems: Cannot modify existing infrastructure
WebSockets:
- High frequency: > 1 message/second per user
- Bidirectional: Client and server both send
- Low latency: Real-time collaboration needed
Common Anti-patterns to Avoid
Premature Optimization
- Don't: Start with microservices for small applications
- Do: Begin with monolith, extract services when needed
Over-engineering
- Don't: Implement every pattern from day one
- Do: Add complexity as scale demands
Wrong Consistency Model
- Don't: Use eventual consistency for financial data
- Do: Match consistency requirements to business needs
Cache Everything
- Don't: Cache data that changes frequently
- Do: Cache based on access patterns and staleness tolerance
Migration Paths
Monolith → Microservices
- Identify bounded contexts: Domain-driven design
- Extract services gradually: Strangler fig pattern
- Data migration: Separate databases last
- API Gateway: Add centralized routing
- Monitoring: Distributed tracing and logging
Single Database → Distributed
- Add read replicas: Scale read operations
- Implement caching: Reduce database load
- Vertical scaling: Upgrade hardware first
- Horizontal sharding: Last resort for write scaling
Synchronous → Event-driven
- Identify async operations: Background processing
- Add message queues: Decouple services
- Implement event sourcing: Audit trails and replay
- Handle eventual consistency: Update application logic
This decision matrix should guide your architecture choices based on current scale and growth projections. Remember: start simple, scale as needed, and always measure before optimizing.